Friday, 25 March 2016

THE MOTIONS FOR DEBATE ASNC 2016

THE MOTIONS FOR DEBATE (University)

1. This house believe Social Networking Sites is good for society.
2. This house supports non-undergraduate thesis program in the university.
3. This house believes Indonesia just technology uses, not inventors.
4. This house would go US to promote democracy in the Middle East.
5. This house believes Donald Trump is the right candidate to be the next president of U.S.
6. This House Believes the FBI should stop attempting to force Apple to betray its own encryption system.
7. THB Single-sex schools are good for education.
8. THBT posting students’ grades on bulletin boards publicly motivate them to perform better.
9. This house would supports KIA (Kartu Identitas Anak).
10. This house believes higher tuition fees to private schools today doesn’t correlate with education improvement.
11. This house would go the idea of having more driving licenses based on the vehicle you have.
12. This house believes moral education in modern school today is deteriorating.
13. This house believes that LGBT are an ill.
14. THBT Indonesia is not ready for MEA .
15. THBT we should not keep our mother language in this globalization era.
16. THBT internet and smartphone make people unsociable.
17. THW abolish National Examination (UN).
18. THBT student are not allowed to bring vehicles to school.
19. This house believes studying overseas is much better than studying in our home country.

2 comments:

  1. halo, kami mewakili beberapa entitas mau memberi saran untuk lomba debat asnc uin. untuk adjudicator tolong pastikan mengikuti perdebatan saat ini untuk lebih detail coba simak beberapa general comment dan decision dari adjudicators di perlombaan berikut:
    ALSA E-COMP UI
    ACDC UGM
    ALSA E-CHAL UNPAD
    NEWBIES UI
    AEO BINUS
    UADC
    dan pastinya pastikan adjudicators bersertifikat bukan masih persifat panelist, saran ini bukan kami ajukan karena kalah dengan adjudicator yang ada namun decision juri dan komentarnya tidak dapat diterima.
    "1st speaker should not bring wide comparation" - 1st speakernya kami lihat tidak bawa komparasi sama sekali
    "3rd speaker should not bring too many rebuttals" - sebenarnya sudah menjadi tugas 3rd speaker untuk fully rebuttal
    "this debate is about data, not your own opinion" - 1 pertanyaan menarik jika memang hanya soal data, untuk apa kita berdebat?

    Salah satu team dengan membawa rebuttals pada reply speaker sama sekali tidak dikomentar yang sudah jelas tidak dapat membawa argument baru, rebuttal, dan data baru.
    Terimakasih selamat bertugas 
    akunanonimus@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete